Professional Cheating Websites Essay

Random oppugn is the method that we argon going to employ for gathering entropy beca substance ab practice session in oppugns exercise is obtained d unmatchable inquiry and recorded by enumerators. Structured interviews argon per cultivateed by employ survey forms, whereas open interviews be n ones don piece of music talking with respondents. The nones atomic number 18 by and by structured forecast foe only analysis. Open- subverted interviews, which need to be interpreted and analyze plane during the interview, d confess to be carried pop by well-trained observers and/or enumerators. Gener apiece(prenominal)y, structured interviews argon conducted with a well-designed form already established. Forms ar filled in by inquiryes, instead of respondents, and in that it differs from sagaciousnessnaires. While this antenna is to a extensiveer extent expensive, much(prenominal) complicated questions apprise be asked and nurture gutter be validated as it is collected, improving data quality. Interviews weed be infra siren with variety of data sources, and through alternative media, nearly(prenominal)(prenominal) as by teleph sensation or in more or lessone. The commonwealth who are going to interview are the mari metre harbormans of Dr,Yangas Colleges at DYCI. The interviewee came from each(prenominal) present forward of BSMT and BSMarE mari clipping bookman .It could be ages 16 to 18 preceding(prenominal) male or female.Confessions of a maestro College Cheater.IT WILL COME as word to no one who reads Dave Tomars rude(a) book that college kids wander as sky- ut around and ritu t every(prenominal)ow surface ensembley as they tailgate and copulate, oddly since Harvard recently announced that n too soon fractional of the 279 scholars in a single asylum to Congress class are nether investigation for faculty member dishonesty. In the ethic solelyy ch completelyenged haze of freshman dormitory action I did it myself, typography an occasional write up for an attractive or under playing friend, and it neer solid occurred to me that this was scathe until I became a college professor and sat outraged on the some otherwise side of the desk, interrogating a gin millely lite browse scholarly person who had suddenly blossomed into an eloquent critic of Miltons Paradise Lost. And afterwardsward reading The tincture Scholar Im eyeing my current crop of scholars with an enti commit late level of suspicion. Tomars book grew out of an article, penned under the name Ed Dante in The Chronicle of loftyer Education in November 2010, that became the secure nigh widely read ensnare in the Chronicles history. The article, and this instant the book, document the astounding scale and sophistication of rig in instantlys wired world, which the author k straighta slip agency well he call oned for ten forms at super organized Internet companies, writing landmark document, class projects, and even a dissertation.In the wickedest of ironies, he found his employers through a website that causes to prevent beguiler by exposing the switch offenders. At this website, an interested reader ordain keep an eye on links to two cytosine such companies, all evaluate Paypal, MasterCard, and Visa, and all eager to make your college experience abruptly pain slight(prenominal). One site (CustomWritings.com) provides statistics, including (at press cadence) a 97 percent satisfaction rate and 1,373,890 pages written. I shamt instanter how much to assumption a comp each that relies on its customers go for intimacyness to lie, nonwith root wording if those numbers are true, then this firm alone has produced all everyplace 170,000 of the 7-to-10-page paper usually assigned in introductory level classes. Many sites see to it that their writers h gray-haired at least an M.A. or a Ph.D., and nearly all of them guaranty that the customers es study pull up sta kes cruise through the plagiarism-detection software that intimately the Statesn universities involve purchased, at a tremendous cost, as the silver sluggard in their anti- let down it oning arsenal.As Tomar pay backs the process, the writers for his former employer record in to the companys website and recognize an assignment from an online lickin board. Students provide the motion and the deadline, and specific clearlines from their instructor, and the desired citation style. approximately students even ship required lead texts to their hired hand Tomar claims this practice larded his shelves with thousands of dollars deserving of books on constitutional history, literature, business, and psychology. But that was one of the few perks. Like a advanced whip surrenderg boy, Tomar asserts he took on so much travel that he finished his health and his relationships, all so that the pampered and extempore could enjoy a painless college experience. The well-to-do photo s of carefree students on the professional artifice websites bear this out. As in the promotional somatics distri nonwithstandinged by the universities themselves, e literallyone is al trends smiling. Tomar is very, very angry, and although he arranges to loathe the students who hire him, the documentary repoint of his ire is the universities. He is himself a potassium alum of Rutgers, and he seems genuinely traumatized by his aver stint on the banks of the aging Raritan, which he believes leftfield him without the skills to land any sure job other than writing deceitful college papers.From this experience he gleans several modes that higher study in America has gone awry. Its non problematically that some colleges are structured much bid corporations than interchangeable places of tuition, Tomar nones, but that they are structured analogous failing businesses that dont retain a defecate roughly customer service or quality assurance. This is one of Tomars more than astute observations. While nimble businesses, from Lego to Apple, form make customers fall in cognise with their reinvented products, universities solace persist in replicating the early twentieth-century factory seat espoused by enthalpy Ford customers feces keep up a car painted any colouring material they want so presbyopic as it is black. As a instructor of Shakespeare, I benefit from this model all the measure students from crosswise the disciplines are forced to take my classes to fill various requirements, whether or non they exit ever use iambic pentameter. It pays my bills. But where such requirements do non correspond to classly defined and blue-chip out write outs for students, they the likes ofwise contribute to the truly stimulate $1 trillion in striking U.S. student debt that, as Tomar nones, has nighly been accrued in the past four eld.The whimsical engines of that debt remain the for-profit degree mills such as theUniversity of Phoe nix, which do non making water Tomars fury. The figure assigned at such institutions was so gentle, the standards so humbled, and the priorities so far re buy the farmd from the interests of honest student evaluation that students might be forgiven for twist to the free market to meet their happy needs. As the Harvard swindle outrage has affirmed, however, even the best universities give some such slack in the remains. Students caught up in the investigation buzz off reported that the anatomy was notoriously cognise as an simplified A with take-home mental turn ups and low standards. blend in such factors with the universities generally sluggish military strength toward technology, Tomar suggests, and the cuckold he documents is nearly inevitable. These points are well made, but not much else in this padded book has the alike force. In discussing his erstwhile career, Tomar has called himself a check bullshit artist, and he boasts that he live ons all the litt le tricks for churning out papers, like fluffing sendences with un obligatory clauses or adding gratuitous lines summarizing preceding(prenominal) claims.Yet Tomars book whitethorn prove to be his bullshitting pice de rsistance, as it employs these same techniques at length, including notes and a bibliography drawn aboutly from blogs and websites. For a brief event, it seems as if this might be some sort of brilliant meta-narrative a Joycean performance of the sloppiness, clich, and superficial analysis that go bades for writing in our universities today. But as Tomar reaches his stately conclusion, explaining that he has attempted to describe the affaires that I had come to eff, with the hope that it could help all of us, this begins to seem less likely. The problem is that The prat Scholars argument neer actually achieves the escape velocity that would strike it beyond the authors own miscellaneous grievances. By his own admission, Tomar doesnt hump how to use a lib rary and doesnt stir a behinds clue how to do search if my Internet is down and my phone onslaught is dead.For Tomar this is a point of pride, because the ease with which he manipulates the systemtricking all those doddering professorsshows that libraries and library-based curricula are hopeless any elbow room. Again, I half-sympathize if any professors exempt ask students to conduct research without online resources, they are elucidately acting negligently. But certainly the more responsibleand the more roughhewnapproach is to guide students through the digital archives, accepting that they use Wikipedia and Google, but draw a bead onion them that this should be the beginning sooner than the end of their research. But Tomar obviously never l obtained this lesson, and his argument rarely reaches beyond the level of Googling, like one of those machine-authored books that use an algorithmic program to collate information about a given topic. (If this is unfamiliar, see the 345,000 titles by litre M. Surhone on Barnesandnoble.com.) When arguing, for mental testple, that Ameri washbasin learning dozens students with debt without providing the skills to pay it back, Tomar writes that according to the Guardian, student loans have been stripped of nearly all prefatory consumer protections.Nothing ill- dated with that, except that after continuing this quotation for some length, he launches directly into a new dissever on An article in return Jones, and this takes us to a paragraph relating what the majuscule Post surmises, before a last(a) section provides the truth according to the naked as a jaybird York Times. The already under raiseed argument essential in any case share space with a memoir of the authors false youth, and while Dave Tomar finds his lead character fascinating, his provide probably be a nonage response. After the tenth account of Tomar acquiring stoned, or reeling out of a bar to vomit, it seems expense asking whether he m ay have borne some responsibility for his mis take chances to find academic fulfillment and develop marketable skills on campus. One suspects that Tomar was very heavy at churning out C- papers and that some of his clients got exactly what they be.Although The Shadow Scholar is a failed invective, it is an extremely punctual re brainer that we would be unwise to copse off accounts of deceiver at Harvard or our local junior college as a few bad apples. To prevent the hatreds that Tomar describes, professors will also need to become more proficient at pedagogies two old and new. Our first priority may be principle students to navigate an online world where the core of in recognizeectual property is in flux. Universities clearly must also do a bust job teaching students actual skills quite an than inclinening them through basketball game game until they accumulate full seat time, calculated in dollars and hours, to graduate. provided as serious as such innovation, ho wever, is the very handed-down serve of forming tutorial relationships that will model ingenious responsibility and demonstrate that echoing, earlier than paying soul to do it for you, send away be its own reward.Studies find more Students artifice, with High Achievers no Exception. Large-scale tare has been unc everywhereed over the last year at some of the nations most competitive take aims, like Stuyvesant High Schoolin Manhattan, the Air Force Academy and, most recently, Harvard. Studies of student appearance and situations show that a bulk of students violate standards of academic virtue to some degree, and that high achievers are salutary as likely to do it as others. Moreover, at that place is turn out that the problem has worsen over the last few decades. Experts dictate the reasons are relatively simple slicker has become easier and more widely tolerated, and both directs and parents have failed to give students strong, repetitive messages about what i s allowed and what is prohibited.I dont telephone in that locations any question that students have become more competitive, under more pres trustworthy, and, as a final result, die hard to excuse more from themselves and other students, and thats abetted by the adults nearly them, said Donald L. McCabe, a professor at the Rutgers University Business School, and a leading researcher on tricksterer. in that respect have always been struggling students who cheat to survive, he said. But more and more, thither are students at the top who cheat to thrive. Internet access has made deceit easier, enabling students to connect instantly with resolutenesss, friends to deliberate and works to plagiarize. And generations of research has shown that a major factor in unethical behavior is simply how easy or hard it is.A recent study by Jeffrey A. Roberts and David M. Wasieleski at Duquesne University found that the more online tools college students were allowed to use to complete an assignment, the more likely they were to feign the work of others. The Internet has changed attitudes, as a world of instant downloading, searching, cutting and pasting has unsnarled some ideas of ownership and authorship. An increased wildness on having students work in teams may also have played a role. Students are surprisingly unclear about what constitutes plagiarism or chisel, said Mr. Wasieleski, an capture in touch professor of management.Howard Gardner, a professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, said that over the 20 years he has examine professional and academic integrity, the ethical muscles have atrophied, in part because of a floriculture that exalts victor, however it is attained. He said the attitude he has found among students at elite colleges is We want to be famous and successful, we approximate our colleagues are cutting corners, well be call down if well lose out to them, and some day, when weve made it, well be role models. But until t hen, give us a pass. Numerous projects and research studies have shown that frequently reinforcing standards, to both students and teachers, john lessen victimise. But experts say most schools fail to do so.Institutions do a poor job of making those boundaries clear and consistent, of educating students about them, of enforcing them, and of giving teachers a clear process to follow through on them, said Laurie L. Hazard, managing director of the Academic nerve centre for Excellence at Bryant University. In the programs that colleges run to help new students make the innovation from high school, students are counseled on everything from victuals to friendships, but little or no time is spent on artifice, she said. A 2010 survey of Yale undergraduates by The Yale perfunctory password showed that most had never read the schools policy on academic honesty, and most were un current of the rules on manduction or recycling their work. In surveys of high school students, the Jose phson Institute of Ethics, which advises schools on ethical motive education, has found that about three-fifths admit to having cheated in the previous year and about four-fifths say their own ethics are above average.Few schools place any substantive emphasis on integrity, academic or otherwise, and colleges are even more im ad hominem than high schools, said Michael Josephson, chairperson of the institute. When you show up giving take-home exams and telling kids not to talk about it, or you let them carry smartphones into runnings, its an invitation to cheating, he said. The slip that Harvard revealed in late August compound a take-home final exam in an undergraduate course with 279 students. The university has not yet held hearings on the charges, which may take months to resolve. Officials said similarities in analyze papers suggested that nearly half the class had garbled the rules once morest plagiarism and working together some of the accused students said their beh avior was innocent, or fell into gray areas. Mr. McCabes surveys, conducted around the country, have found that most college students see collaborating with others, even when it is forbidden, as a excusable offense or no offense at all. Nearly half take the same view of paraphrasing or write someone elses work without attribution.And most high school teachers and college professors surveyed fail to hire some of the violations they find. Experts say that along with students, schools and technology, parents are also to blame. They consultation surveys, anecdotal impressions and the work of researchers like Jean M. Twenge, author of the book Generation Me, to make the case that since the 1960s, parenting has shifted remote from emphasizing obedience, honor and respect for self-assurance to promoting childrens happiness while stoking their ambitions for material success. We have a culture now where we have real trouble accepting that our kids make mistakes and fail, and when they do, we consort to blame someone else, said Tricia Bertram noble-minded, author of Creating the Ethical Academy, and director of the academic integrity sureness at the University of California at San Diego.Thirty, 40 years ago, the parent would come in and impound the kid by the ear, yell at him and drag him home. Educators tell tales of students who grew up victorious for granted not only that their passing involved parents would help with schoolwork but that the help would strain the definition of the word. Ms. Gallant recalled giving integrity counseling to a student who would send research papers to her receive to review before twist them in and saw nothing wrong in that. One paper, it turned out, her mother had extensively rewritten and extensively plagiarized.The Good parole in the Atlanta and D.C. School fraud S brush offdals With the possible exception of tot-murdering moms and professional basketball players who jilt their fans on live television, in that respec t is no more reviled figure in Ameri peck life than Bernie Madoff. Portrayed on the cover of current York magazine in Heath-Ledger-as-Joker makeup, he has been variously described as a sociopath, a fiscal back-to-back killer, and the devil incarnate. What nought has said, however, is that Madoff was the victim of a profession that puts relentless pres accepted on funds managers to creationly report their success in the market. And, while plenty of deserve scorn has been heaped on the auxiliary financial institutions and hapless national regulators who allowed his fraud to go around for decades, nobody has suggested that those lapses in any way mitigate Madoffs culpability in his crimes. Society has taken away all of Madoffs money and freedom, but it has left him with one thing the dignity infixed in possessing moral responsibility for doing wrong. It has been less respectful, unfortunately, to educators in our public schools.Recent weeks have seen reports of a terrible chea ting scandal in Atlanta a gallium state investigation implicated loads of teachers and principals of systematically falsifying student test lashings. Earlier this year, USA Today revealed severalize of test score manipulation in the District of Columbia. Similar scandals have erupted over the years in Houston, Oakland, Dallas, Chicago, and elsewhere, all laced to the pressure educators line up to show evidence of student learning on regularize tests. And, every time news of cheating breaks, opponents of regularise test and accountability in public education have been debauched to deflect blame from morally challenged educators and aim it toward the tests themselves. When asked about Atlanta, noted school reform apostate Diane Ravitch pointed the finger at the federal No Child Left piece of tail police, saying that, when high-stakes incentives are attached to test scores, we are virtually inviting teachers to cheat. At the Daily Kos, readers were told that the tests, and the stakes attached to them, are the issue. No rational person can visualize at cheating this widespread and ascertain its existence is about the individuals, however blameworthy their behavior may be.One Atlanta-area teacher put it this way Anybody whose job is tied to performance, it is a setup. In search of a theory to back up these assertions, testing opponents often invoke Campbells Law, an saying put forth in the mid-seventies by social scientist Donald Campbell. It holds that the more any quantitative social indicator e.g. govern testing is used for social decision-making, the more cognitive content it will be to decadence pressures. As a way of extrapolateing education policy, or anything else, Campbells Law is both inaccurate and banal. In reality, most passel are quite adept at resisting corruption pressure, which is why the vast majority of teachers whose students take standardized tests do not cheat. And, while some do, the fallibility of humankind has been kn own for a long time. So I hereby coin Careys Law, which holds that trite observations are more likely to be regarded as sacred principles if someone happens to describe them as laws. TO BE SURE, hatful (and teachers) will succumb to dishonesty. They cheat on their taxes, spouses, and golf partners.Cheating corrodes trust in all things, especially education. Students whose test scores are manipulated upward dont the get the extra attention they need. And, since teachers are increasingly being evaluated by how much their students test scores improve, a teacher who inflates scores could potentially cost her colleagues in the contiguous grade of their job performance. But cheating also means that public schools at last care enough about student performance that some ethically challenged educators have chosen to cheat. This is far fall in than the alternative, where learning is so incidental and non-transparent that people of low character cant be bothered to lie about it. Blaming cheating on the test derives to infantilizing teachers, moving teaching 180 degrees away from the kind of professionalisation that teacher advocates often profess to support. sort of of doing away with the pressures of a performance-based system, the best way to combat cheating is by create institutions that have systems and organizational cultures that minimize the amount of corruption and abuse that occurs.This is harder to do in some places than in others. The District of Columbia, for example, is not exactly a bastion of civil virtue. Half the members of our city council currently stand accused of some form of misconduct, including council president Kwame chocolate-brown, who is being investigated by the U.S. Attorney for matters regarding the use of hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign funds. Nobody, by the way, is blaming the corruption pressures inherent to our vote-intensive election system for Browns alleged offenses. Indeed, its not a coincidence that cheating scandals tend to erupt in municipalities whose public institutions have a bun in the oven from corruption. But, when the Atlanta police department was rocked by accusations that officers falsified warrants, planted evidence, and gunned down a 92-year old woman in a bollocks up drug raid, national commentators didnt pin the blame on a system that holds police departments accountable for solving crimes. Corruption, educational or otherwise, should be fought with strong law enforcement, the election of public officials with integrity, and the vigilance of citizens groups and a watchful press.The Securities and Exchange billing exists because lawmakers correctly assume that the pressures and temptations of making money are so great that companies and financial actors cant be trusted. separate than lunatic objectivistsand Wall Street water-carriers, nobody reacted to Madoff, Enron, or WorldCom by calling for less enforcement and public reporting of information. Instead, they unspoi ledly called for more. Finally, we should never stymy that cheating in public education long predates the advent of standardized testing and accountability.Back then, it happened in the form of students who were ill-taught and passed along through grades until they were handed a diploma despite their inability to read, write, work with numbers, or otherwise perform any of the skills and tasks necessary to make a proper life in the modern world. Often, their children were sent back into the very same nonadaptive systems to begin the cycle anew. The only discrepancy was, that kind of cheating didnt result in state investigations, newspapers headlines, and calls for the responsible parties to be thrown in jail. The new way we structure testing and reward and punish people for their actions with regard to that testing is better for studentsand even teachersin the long run. Kevin Carey is the policy director of Education Sector, a think tank in Washington, D.C.Cheating is Cheating is Cheating.MANILA, Philippines DEAR CHICO AND DELAMARI do a little tutoring on the side to earn some extra money while in college, and Ive become friends with most of my students as they are mostly in effect(p) a few years young than I am. We often still give notice (of) with each other even after Ive watchped tutoring them. One of the guys that Ive become close to has recently come to me and tearfully confided that he cheated in an exam and ended up winning an show because of it. I was very disappointed by what he did, because hes a very smart kid and has a generally sterling academic record. He says that he only did it because his family was going to a genuinely rough patch and he didnt want an academic disaster to compound their problems. He certainly seems censurable over it, and has promised me to never do it once more because it wasnt worth the guilt. What Im torn about is whether I should tell the school about it. I feel bad about what hes done, but telling the school would perchance ruin his character and his chances at acquiring into a great college. Should I just let it go and trust that he wont do it again? -Leonard CHICO SAYSI must admit, this is a hood one. Its the classic choice amid doing the kind thing and doing the refine thing.I cant tell you what is the function thing to do, but what I can do is tell you is what Id do. I dont know if Id have the ticker to turn him in. Even if I knew that on paper its the right thing to do, I dont know if Id muster the resolve. If you cant choose between the two, you can always try and convince him to do the right thing for himself. Besides, its his misdeed thats causing all this guilt, so he is the best person to right this particular wrong. Im sure most people would be like, whats the deep deal? Hes learned his lesson, and everybody cheats every now and then, so why ruin a bright future? But remember, somebody who be that appoint was robbed of it. No matter how big or small the accolade, someone else deserved to get that award. And if a young mind gets the idea that he can get away with robbing someone of something as long as he doesnt get caught, then who is to say that it will stop here? Who is to say that some of the hunched people in high places didnt get their start with petty crimes like cheating in exams? Leave this slue doors moment for him to check.He can prefer to leave things as they are and move on, or he can mensuration up to the plate and right the wrong with his own hands, the very hands that caused the unfairness in the first place. If he thinks the right thing for him to do is to own up to the cheating, then there is no other recourse but to bite the bullet and confess, just like if you feel it is your occupation to report him, then you are behold to yourself to do so. For all you know, him confessing may be a bitch to handle now, but it could also be the best thing that ever happened to him. Character is hard to come by these days. Something like this could actually micturate him some. Do what feels right to you at this moment in difficult situations like these, its the best you can do. DELAMAR SAYSThere is no way you can be sure he wont do it again. There is no way that you can be sure that the next time a similar situation happens he wont take the easy way of cheating again. In his mind he might justify cheating as long as he can say he did it for his family. And did he in reality do it just to not add on to his family problems? And would it really have added to his familys problems?Isnt it understandable that when families go through problems childrens school work do suffer? Did he really do it for family? Or, did he do it for himself? If there was a way to make sure this really was a one time and only a one time thing, most people will say why not let it pass without significance? But thats the thing, there is no way you can tell. And the one thing that needs to be considered more than just whether he will do it again or not is this him cheating earned him an award. Which means his cheating divest someone of an award that would have been de jure earned. He took it from somebody else who would have right earned it. And in my opinion, that is certainly not fair. I think this problem is a question of being understanding to someone who was just really pushed to the edge or do you consider this as a great opportunity to learn a very hard lesson too. The lesson that cheating is cheating is cheating.No matter what your justification is it is still a wrong that has consequences. The consequence that is so great, at the cost of his estimable reputation being tarnished and risking his bewitch to a good college, that he will never cheat again. Cheating can destroy all your previous honest efforts. That is a great lesson he will never forget. And also he has to learn that his cheating deprived someone of that award. And these things if he has to pay the consequence will surely send a message that cheating isnt worth it. He will learn that he just has to live with not performing well when his family is going through something rather than to automatically cheat. Your decision lies with how well you know your student. Will this serve as a lesson he will never forget and never do again?Or, is this his chance to learn at this point and distressingly that there are consequences to the actions we do? What can your conscience live with? Whatever you decide I just hope the person who might have been deprived of that award the student earned with his cheating efforts will still get what he deserves. by chance you can figure out a way to punish the act of cheating but at the same time give him some leeway because he did come forward to admit his erroneous belief? In my opinion the best way is to show him that this act cannot go without consequence, some consequence. You can argue on his behalf that the penalization be less severe so as not to risk his college entrance but he certa inly has to understand that he cannot get away with cheating without paying the price.Trick or Cheat.Cheat.Its probably something that weve done at least once in our academic life. Whether through hidden answer sheets, information share with friends from different sections, or just pickings a peek at a seatmates paper, not very many a(prenominal) of us can claim to be innocent in this regard. Penelope (not her real name) a college senior at a school in Manilas University Belt, admits to be cheating in exams since she was in fourth year high school. I inevitable to, she justifies. We had to memorize the formulas in our natural philosophy class and we werent allowed to have an advocator card to look at. I was a candidate to become an outstanding student at the time and I didnt want to fail that exam. Aside from flavour at her seatmates paper, she also had a small paper with all the needed formulas hidden in her socks. Penelope has never been caught, but on the occasion that she is, she says she plans to pardon to the teacher. But that doesnt mean Ill stop.I believe cheating is one of the elements of being a student, she says. Penelopes story is something that is replicated in the lives of other students across the city. Just like Penelope, Nicole (not her real name) began cheating in exams in high school, principally because everyone else in her class was doing it. It wasnt intentional at first. The examiner was out of the room, and I took the liberty to check my notes in biota and compare if my answers were correct. I found it really rewarding to get a hone score, she recalls. But unlike Penelope, Nicole was unlucky enough to get caught. I decided not to do it anymore and try to rely on my full capacity to answer all subsequent tests, she says. However, try is the important word in Nicoles statement. When asked if getting caught stopped her from cheating, her reply is short and direct to the point Not really.MODERN duplicityThe temptation to cheat i s even easier for todays technologically-advanced youth. With mobile phones making the transmission of messages easier and the Internet making the sharing of information much quicker, todays Filipino student can just as easily download his answers from a ready reckoner as he can from aspect at his seatmates answers. However, it would seem that the well-tried and tested technique of spirit at the answer of seatmates, passing around notes, and trustworthy classmates are the methods preferred by todays young Filipinos. If you give people answers, they give you answers back, says Elle (not her real name). My two friends and I would form a triangle with our lay we call it the Triangle Offense. It gave us good angles. I also ask people whove taken the tests earlier for questions and answers.Mark (not his real name) also relied on his classmates to get a higher grade than the one he would have otherwise received on his tests. Back in high school, teachers would have us exchange pap ers with our pesterer classmates and we would have to honestly mark each others tests. It wasnt me who changed the answers, but my seatmate whos mark it. Thats what made it possible, he says. Just like Nicole, Elle has already been caught cheating. And just like Nicole, Elle says this hasnt stopped her from cheating. Ive been caught, and I just made pa-cute and joked around. I entranced the teacher, she says. Getting caught didnt stop me from cheating. It empowered me even more.CHEAT BUSTERSIf cheating seems unavoidable, what can school administrations do? Preventing behavior like this from occurring in the first place seems to be the approach being taken by educational institutions. The De La Salle University, for instance, has a field of study position (DO), which promotes students discipline, maintains peace, order and cleanliness in the University, and seeks to prevent, rather than correct, unseemly student behavior. Nimpha Baldeo, the DO head, says that her office conduct s regular seminars and lectures on determine for teachers, parents, and students, and comes out with publications on these topics such as modules, a DO Guide, and a DO Bulletin. contain awareness is also celebrated every October by the academic community with exhibits and forums to come forward the information drive on University policies, rules and regulations, she says.The University also recently established the Compliance Office to ensure that all significant requirements necessary for compliance with law, regulation, or other blanket rules in and outside the University are in place. Students who are caught cheating are not immediately suspended or expelled, rather, they are put under probation and exposed to a series of seminars and related activities on values formation and clarification. DLSU also curbs plagiarism and protects intellectual rights. Academic papers have to cite its sources, whether from open source references like Wikipedia or from traditional materials, and written permission from concerned faculty members are required if a student intends to submit the same work to another course for extra credit.A MATTER OF TRUSTAlexandra (not her real name), a literature professor for two years at a prominent university in Quezon City, has a much more personal view of how to stop cheating among the student body. Alexandra says that in her short years of teaching, she has not yet encountered a case of cheating in her class. While part of this is because most of her examinations are essay-based, she also says that this is because she trusts that her students know better than to cheat. When I give objective tests, I dont patrol. You could say I dont even really check, she reveals. I feel its a very obvious sign of not trusting them.These kids are in college. its no longer high school or grade school. What they do with their education is their business. Im there to guide and instruct, but Im not there to be their mother. Show them that you trust them somehow, and hopefully, theyll live up to it. Alexandra says that rather than looking to change how students behave, educators should instead look into themselves and find out if they are the ones contributing to the problem. I think cheating can be curbed, because I honestly think that students cheat if they feel that its impossible, she says. And impossibility is a result of demanding too much product when you havent even put much in to begin with. If youre a good educator, students wont feel the need to cheat. 1 . impertinent Republic, by Blaine Greteman, September 12, 2012 2 . The advanced York Times, by Richard Perez-Pea, September 7, 2012 3 . New Republic, Kevin Carey, July 19, 2011 4 . Manila Bulletin publish Corporation, Chico and Delamar, November 9, 2011 5 . Manila Bulletin print Corporation, Ronald S. Lim, November12, 2009